By Carl Charles, Skadden Fellow, LGBT & HIV Project

Like any good attorney, I enjoy winning and being right. However, as a transgender attorney watching the fallout from antitransgender legislation across the country spin out of control, this is one time I wanted to be wrong. I wanted to be wrong about the prediction that antitrans legislation and rhetoric would spur further discrimination and hostility towards all people, not just trans folks. Sadly, this hatred of trans people has had the exact result we anticipated: increased harassment of all people in bathrooms as well as continued pernicious violence against trans women.   

Reports are rolling in from across the country of nontransgender women being policed and harassed in bathrooms. A 22-year-old Connecticut cisgender woman was harassed in a Wal-Mart bathroom this week because someone thought she was transgender. In Texas, where Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick has been unapologetic in his transphobia, a Texas woman trying to use a women’s restroom in a hospital was accosted by a man twice her size trying to make sure she was “going in the right place,” all because she was wearing a baseball hat with short hair.  

And, of course, the violence and harassment of trans women has not stopped or decreased. Earlier this month, trans woman Reese Walker was murdered in Wichita, Kansas, a state that proposed legislation awarding students a $2,500 bounty if they reported trans people in the restroom. In Florida this last week, beloved trans woman Mercedes Successful was found murdered in a huge blow to the LGBT community in Haines City, Florida.

In Washington, D.C., this week, where transgender people are protected from discrimination under city law, a trans woman was assaulted by a security guard at a Giant grocery store. “You guys cannot keep coming in here and using our women’s restroom,” the guard told her as she pushed her out of the store. “They did not pass the law yet.”  Also, in New York City, trans woman Pearl Love was verbally and physically attacked by a nontranswoman on a subway train in a video that went viral and prompted a response from presidential candidate Hilary Clinton.

It seems like things are going to get quite worse for trans people before they get better.

Just last night, Oklahoma lawmakers introduced SB1619, which requires schools to provide students a “religious exemption” if they are offended by trans students in school bathrooms. The real kicker to this bill is that a reasonable accommodation for transphobic students is not a single-user bathroom — like trans students have been forced to use — but rather a multi-user “trans-free” restroom, again demonstrating that at the heart of these bills is a devaluation of trans youth’s very existence.  

Despite the fact that actual problems face many state legislatures, states like Georgia and Tennessee are going out of their way to arrange special sessions to discuss barring trans people from bathrooms in schools and public places. And in Washington State, a hateful ballot initiative is gathering steam that, among other things, would nullify state laws protecting trans people from discrimination and allow students to sue schools for up to $2,500 if they encounter a trans person in a bathroom.  

If the whirlwind of 2016 has taught us anything, it’s that transphobia hurts all of us. It makes our communities and schools less safe and more heavily policed; it continues to assure the public that violence and exclusion of trans people from public life is the status quo; and it prevents all students from focusing on their education — an education that should arguably include values such as acceptance and compassion.

We must continue to fight back against these hateful messages and realize supporting trans people means supporting everyone’s right to dignity and justice.

Date

Friday, May 20, 2016 - 11:45am

Featured image

Trans People Under Attack

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ+ and Two Spirit Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

55

Style

Standard with sidebar
Girls are required to wear dresses. Boys are required to wear pants. 
 
That statement may sound like it’s coming from 1950, but some school districts across the United States have tried to enforce antiquated dress codes telling students exactly how they should dress for their high school graduations. They require girls to wear dresses or skirts and boys to wear pants. This is more than just a throwback to a bygone era; it’s an unlawful gender-based distinction.
 
If it seems wrong to you for public schools to enforce outdated gender norms, you’re right. While public schools may regulate what students wear by requiring formal attire at celebratory events such as graduation, they may not draw distinctions between male and female students that are based on outdated notions of what constitutes appropriate female attire. A dress code that relies on gender stereotypes violates both the Constitution and laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender and sex in public schools.
 
Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in educational institutions that receive federal funding. Courts have consistently recognized that discriminating against a person for failing to conform to gender norms is illegal sex stereotyping. Additionally, a requirement that all female students wear dresses to graduation amounts to sex discrimination under the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Such a requirement is based on an old-fashioned and overbroad generalization of how female students should look and act. Discriminatory dress codes can interfere with a student’s opportunity to participate in important school celebrations, and no student should have to choose between participating in a graduation ceremony and wearing attire that makes her deeply uncomfortable.
 
So what can you do if your school is trying to enforce such an outdated dress code at your graduation? We’ve put together a sample letter to help you to end discriminatory dress codes at your school. You can edit this letter to fit your situation and use it to inform your principal or superintendent that the dress code they’re imposing is unreasonable, and more importantly, unlawful.
 
If your school won’t change its policy even after you’ve presented them with the letter, please reach out to us at the ACLU of South Dakota. If you’re successful in getting your school to change a bad dress code policy, let us know that too!
 
Good luck and happy graduation!

Date

Tuesday, May 12, 2015 - 3:30pm

Featured image

Graduation Caps

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Religious Liberty

Documents

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

55

Style

Standard with sidebar

By: Tyler Brandt

I've been out to my family and friends since I was in the 5th grade. I'm not ashamed of being gay, and I don't hide who I am from anyone.

After school ended last semester, I wanted to find a summer job for the usual teenage reasons: spending money for clothes, a cell phone, going out with friends, and maybe even save up a little too. I applied for a crew member position at the Taco John's in my town – Yankton, South Dakota – in early June, interviewed the next day, and started working the night shift the day after that.

I hadn't been working at Taco John's long before the night manager was saying things about me to other employees behind my back, calling me "faggot" and saying things like, "Tyler is so gay it's not even funny."

About three weeks after I'd started working there, the night manager called me into the office and handed me a name tag he'd just made. He said, "Wear this!" with a huge grin on his face like he was really proud of himself. I looked at the name tag and saw that it read "Gaytard" with little hearts on either side of the word. My mom raised me to be respectful and polite, and I didn't want to lose my job. So I put the name tag on and then said, "Okay, can I take it off now?" He just laughed at me and told me to leave it on.

He made me wear that embarrassing name tag all night.

Every time I had to help a customer, I tried to stand so that it was hidden by the register. But that didn't really make much difference because the manager kept calling me "gaytard" really loudly in front of customers for the rest of my shift: "Hey, gaytard, help this customer!" and "Take out the trash, gaytard!" It was extremely humiliating.

After I got home, I decided I just couldn't go back for more abuse at Taco John's. I want my little brothers and sisters to look up to me and know that I stood up for myself. So I went to the restaurant the next morning, turned in my uniform, and told the daytime manager why I was quitting. He tried to make me give the name tag back, but I told him I was keeping it.

After I started telling my story publicly, Taco John's International put out a statement saying they take harassment in their restaurants seriously, but they said it was up to the local franchise in Yankton to do something about the humiliation I faced. Well, all the local franchise did about it was say that the name tag was my idea and that I thought it was funny.

It wasn't my idea, and I never thought it was funny. It's a mean, ugly word that makes fun of both gay people and people with developmental disabilities, and I would never call myself a name like that.

That's why today, the American Civil Liberties Union is helping me file formal charges of discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

It was wrong for the manager to humiliate me like that, and it was wrong for Taco John's International to refuse to do anything about what happened at a restaurant with their name. I want other LGBT people to know that this type of harassment is illegal, even in places like South Dakota. And I hope we can make sure nobody who works at any Taco John's ever has to go through that kind of humiliation at work again.

Learn more about LGBT bullying and other civil liberty issuesSign up for breaking news alertsfollow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.

Date

Wednesday, September 24, 2014 - 1:45pm

Featured image

Tyler Brandt, ACLU Client

Show featured video/image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ+ and Two Spirit Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

55

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of South Dakota RSS